The conversation before the conversation.
Scenario library
20 ready scenarios, 12 sectors
From a billing dispute to a factory outage, air traffic to hospital systems. Your team practices the real crises of its own industry; every scenario branches, every choice changes the scene.
Factory Line Stoppage
Mine Safety Crisis
Wind Farm Fire
Holding IT Collapse
Bank Data Center Outage
Warehouse Automation Crisis
Fleet Tracking Loss
Hospital System Emergency
Pharma Cold-Chain Alert
Online Exam Crisis
POS Chain Outage
Construction Project Crisis
Automotive MES Failure
Istanbul Airport ATC
Performance Review
Scenarios built for your company
Describe it in words, let AI build the full simulation, then fine-tune in a visual editor. Define roles, stakeholders and success criteria without a line of code.
Explore the builderHow it works
Speak. Get scored. Improve.
Like talking to a real person. No scripts, no lag. The AI reacts, pushes back, and scores you every turn.
- 01
Live dialogue
Voice, text or video. With an ultra-low-latency voice engine the character interrupts, raises the tension, and reacts to what's actually said.
- 02
Real-time score
Every reply is scored across five behavioral dimensions, instantly. Not keyword matching: the AI reads what you said and how you said it.
- 03
Report & coaching
The conversation ends, the evidence begins. An exportable behavioral profile with strengths, blind spots and personalized coaching tips.
Behavioral analysis
Every session becomes a report
Five behavioral dimensions on a 0–100 scale, always next to a reasoned, explainable coaching note. We measure behavior, not keywords.
Sample debrief
Bank Data Center Outage · 12 turns
75/100
- Empathy strong
- 82
- Problem Solving fair
- 76
- Technical Knowledge strong
- 80
- De-escalation fair
- 71
- Policy & Safety develop
- 68
Coaching note
Owned the customer's anger early, but promised a refund before checking the policy. Verify the rule first, then commit.
Why simulation
Watching is forgotten.
Doing sticks.
Little survives 30 days after passive training. Active simulation makes learning stick by doing and failing safely.
Passive learning · watch, test, forget5%
Active simulation · experience, fail, learn75%
Retention after 30 days · NTL Institute
Get your team ready for the unpredictable
When the real crises hit, your team already knows how to respond.
beta
Not interviews,
simulations.
See a candidate in a real crisis, not on a resume. Everyone faces the same scenario, judged on the same criteria. What's left is not a gut feeling, but a reasoned score you can compare across candidates.
Same engine·voice & text·5 behavioral dimensions·consistent criteria
Why simulation
Evidence, not instinct.
A traditional interview judges the same candidate differently with each interviewer, and mistakes a good presenter for a good worker. Simulation puts everyone on the same ground.
Traditional interview
EVRE Hire
Interviewer bias
Consistent criteria for everyone
Unmeasurable "gut feeling"
Reasoned, explainable score
A good presenter
A candidate whose real work shows
Same engine
The engine behind Training,
now for hiring
Not from scratch. Built on the same mature simulation and behavioral-scoring stack; same engine, a different job.
- 5-dimension score
- Every candidate is scored 0–100 across five behavioral dimensions, with rubric-based, explainable notes.
- Adaptive difficulty
- Difficulty adjusts to the candidate's answers in-session; the counterpart turns tougher or more cooperative. No manual setup.
- Voice interview
- Real-time voice conversation, ultra-low latency. The candidate answers by speaking, not typing.
- Branching scenario
- Not a linear chatbot. Every choice changes the scene and the outcome; rehearsed answers don't help.
Candidate score · sample
Case: Black Friday Crisis · 14 turns
77/100
- Communication strong
- 84
- Structure / STAR fair
- 73
- Domain Depth fair
- 79
- Composure Under Pressure fair
- 70
- Integrity & Ethics fair
- 77
Assessment note
Held structure under pressure and found root cause fast. Stakeholder prioritization stayed weak.
Trust
You decide. We bring the evidence.
Assessing people is sensitive. So everything stays explainable, logged, and under human control.
- Decision support
- EVRE doesn't hire; it produces evidence so you decide better. A human always makes the final call.
- Explainability
- Rubric-based, explainable notes beside every score. There's always an answer to “why this score?”
- Audit trail
- Session- and turn-level logs; consistent, reviewable and comparable across candidates.
- KVKK-aligned
- Built for Turkey. With data minimization and purpose limitation, candidate data is kept only for its purpose.
01
02
03
04
A more honest way to know a candidate
Same scenario, same criteria, a reasoned score. The decision stays yours.